MCQEasyJEE 2023Ligands & Coordination Number

JEE Chemistry 2023 Question with Solution

Given below are two statements: one is labelled as “Assertion A” and the other is labelled as “Reason R

Assertion A: In the complex Ni(CO)4\text{Ni(CO)}_4 and Fe(CO)5\text{Fe(CO)}_5, the metals have zero oxidation state.

Reason R: Low oxidation states are found when a complex has ligands capable of π\pi-donor character in addition to the σ\sigma-bonding.

In the light of the above statement, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below.

  • A

    A is not correct but R is correct.

  • B

    A is correct but R is not correct.

  • C

    Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A.

  • D

    Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.

Answer

Correct answer:C

Step-by-step solution

Standard Method

Given: Assertion A states that in Ni(CO)4\text{Ni(CO)}_4 and Fe(CO)5\text{Fe(CO)}_5, the metals have zero oxidation state. Reason R states that low oxidation states are found when a complex has ligands capable of π\pi-donor character in addition to the σ\sigma-bonding.

Find: Which option correctly evaluates Assertion A and Reason R.

The carbonyl ligand CO\text{CO} is a neutral ligand. Therefore, in both Ni(CO)4\text{Ni(CO)}_4 and Fe(CO)5\text{Fe(CO)}_5, the oxidation state of the metal remains zero.

So, Assertion A is correct.

Low oxidation states of metals are stabilized by synergistic bonding or backbonding. This involves σ\sigma-donation from the ligand to the metal and π\pi-backdonation from the metal to the ligand. For this, the ligand must have empty π\pi orbitals to accept electron density.

Thus, CO\text{CO} acts as a π\pi-acceptor ligand, not a π\pi-donor ligand.

So, Reason R is not correct.

Therefore, the correct option is C.

Coordination Compound Oxidation States Analysis

Given: The complexes are Ni(CO)4\text{Ni(CO)}_4 and Fe(CO)5\text{Fe(CO)}_5.

Find: Whether Assertion A and Reason R are correct, and whether R explains A.

Assertion A: In Ni(CO)4\text{Ni(CO)}_4 and Fe(CO)5\text{Fe(CO)}_5, the carbonyl ligand CO\text{CO} is neutral. Thus, the oxidation state of Ni\text{Ni} and Fe\text{Fe} in these complexes is indeed zero. So, Assertion A is correct.

Reason R: Low oxidation states of metals are stabilized by synergistic bonding, also known as backbonding. This involves σ\sigma-donation from the ligand to the metal and π\pi-backdonation from the metal to the ligand. Crucially, the ligand must have empty π\pi orbitals to accept electrons from the metal. CO\text{CO} is a π\pi-acceptor ligand, not a π\pi-donor ligand. So, Reason R is incorrect.

Therefore, the correct answer is (3): A is correct, but R is not correct.

Common mistakes

  • Treating CO\text{CO} as a charged ligand is incorrect because carbonyl is a neutral ligand. For oxidation state calculation, assign 00 charge to CO\text{CO} and then determine the metal oxidation state.

  • Confusing π\pi-donor ligands with π\pi-acceptor ligands leads to the wrong conclusion. CO\text{CO} stabilizes low oxidation states through π\pi-acceptor behavior via backbonding, not through π\pi-donation.

  • Assuming that any statement mentioning low oxidation state automatically explains a carbonyl complex is incorrect. The explanation must match the actual bonding nature of the ligand involved.

Practice more Ligands & Coordination Number questions

Get unlimited AI-adaptive practice, mastery tracking, and an AI tutor that explains every step — free to start.

Related questions