MCQMediumJEE 2023Ligands & Coordination Number

JEE Chemistry 2023 Question with Solution

Given below are two statements: one is labeled as “Assertion A” and the other is labeled as “Reason R”.

Assertion A: In the complex Ni(CO)4\mathrm{Ni(CO)_4} and Fe(CO)5\mathrm{Fe(CO)_5}, the metals have zero oxidation state. Reason R: Low oxidation states are found when a complex has ligands capable of π\pi-donor character in addition to the σ\sigma-bonding.

In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

  • A

    A is not correct but R is correct.

  • B

    A is correct but R is not correct.

  • C

    Both A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A.

  • D

    Both A and R are correct, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.

Answer

Correct answer:B

Step-by-step solution

Standard Method

Given: Assertion A states that in Ni(CO)4\mathrm{Ni(CO)_4} and Fe(CO)5\mathrm{Fe(CO)_5}, the metals have zero oxidation state. Reason R states that low oxidation states are found when a complex has ligands capable of π\pi-donor character in addition to the σ\sigma-bonding.

Find: Which option correctly evaluates Assertion A and Reason R.

For Assertion A, carbon monoxide is a neutral ligand. Therefore, in Ni(CO)4\mathrm{Ni(CO)_4} and Fe(CO)5\mathrm{Fe(CO)_5}, the oxidation state of the metal remains 00. So, Assertion A is correct.

For Reason R, low oxidation states are generally stabilized by ligands showing π\pi-acceptor character along with σ\sigma-bonding, not by π\pi-donor character. Carbon monoxide is a strong π\pi-acceptor ligand. Hence, Reason R is not correct.

Therefore, the correct option is B: A is correct but R is not correct.

Why the Reason is Incorrect

Given: The complexes are Ni(CO)4\mathrm{Ni(CO)_4} and Fe(CO)5\mathrm{Fe(CO)_5}.

Find: Whether the stated reason explains the assertion.

  1. In oxidation state calculation, each CO\mathrm{CO} ligand contributes zero charge because it is a neutral ligand.
  2. Hence,
Oxidation state of Ni in Ni(CO)4=0\text{Oxidation state of Ni in } \mathrm{Ni(CO)_4} = 0

and

Oxidation state of Fe in Fe(CO)5=0\text{Oxidation state of Fe in } \mathrm{Fe(CO)_5} = 0

So the assertion is true.

  1. The stabilization of metals in low oxidation states occurs when ligands can accept electron density from the metal through back-bonding.
  2. This requires π\pi-acceptor ligands such as CO\mathrm{CO}, not π\pi-donor ligands.

Therefore, the reason is false and does not explain the assertion. The correct option is B.

Common mistakes

  • Treating CO\mathrm{CO} as an anionic ligand is incorrect because carbon monoxide is a neutral ligand. Use neutral-ligand counting first before assigning oxidation state.

  • Confusing π\pi-donor ligands with π\pi-acceptor ligands leads to the wrong conclusion. Low oxidation states are commonly stabilized by back-bonding to π\pi-acceptor ligands such as CO\mathrm{CO}.

  • Assuming that a true assertion automatically makes the reason true is incorrect. Evaluate Assertion A and Reason R independently before checking whether the reason explains the assertion.

Practice more Ligands & Coordination Number questions

Get unlimited AI-adaptive practice, mastery tracking, and an AI tutor that explains every step — free to start.

Related questions