The sequence from the following that would result in giving predominantly -Tribromoaniline is :

- A
Nitrobenzene
- B
Bromobenzene
- C
p-Nitroaniline
- D
Aniline
The sequence from the following that would result in giving predominantly -Tribromoaniline is :

Nitrobenzene
Bromobenzene
p-Nitroaniline
Aniline
Correct answer:C
Standard Method
Given: Four reaction sequences are proposed for obtaining predominantly -Tribromoaniline.
Find: The correct sequence.
The solution identifies option C as the correct option. The reasoning given is based on directing effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution and the subsequent diazotization–Sandmeyer–reduction sequence.
Option A: Bromination of nitrobenzene occurs predominantly at the meta position because is strongly deactivating and meta-directing. Reduction afterward converts to , but this does not lead to the required tribromoaniline pattern.
Option B: Bromobenzene on further bromination gives brominated products directed by bromine, but the later conversion with does not selectively furnish the required tribromoaniline.
Option C: Starting from -nitroaniline, excess bromination introduces multiple bromine substituents under the directing influence of the substituents already present. Then diazotization with followed by replaces the amino-derived diazonium group by bromine. Finally, reduces the nitro group to an amino group. Hence this is the intended sequence for forming the tribromoaniline product.
Option D: Direct bromination of aniline in water gives the usual heavily activated bromination pattern, but not the required sequence as intended in the question.
Conclusion: Therefore, the correct option is C.
Note on the extracted solution: The second approach in the solution itself mentions a regioselectivity inconsistency and discusses -tribromoaniline versus -tribromoaniline. Despite that discrepancy, the solution explicitly concludes that the intended correct answer is option C, and that is taken as the answer authority.
Assuming that direct bromination of aniline in water must give the asked product. This is incorrect because the highly activating group drives rapid ortho/para substitution, and the reaction pattern does not match the intended multistep route. Instead, analyze the full sequence and directing effects at each stage.
Ignoring the directing effect of and treating all substituents as ortho/para directors. This is wrong because is strongly deactivating and meta-directing. Use the directing nature of each group before predicting the next substitution.
Looking only at the first step of each option and not tracking later functional-group interconversions. This leads to an incorrect choice because diazotization, Sandmeyer substitution, and reduction change the substituents and final orientation. Follow the entire sequence step by step.
Get unlimited AI-adaptive practice, mastery tracking, and an AI tutor that explains every step — free to start.