Let be a non-constant twice differentiable function such that . If a real-valued function is defined as , then:
- A
for at least two in
- B
for exactly one in
- C
for no in
- D
Let be a non-constant twice differentiable function such that . If a real-valued function is defined as , then:
for at least two in
for exactly one in
for no in
Correct answer:A
Standard Method
Given: and .
Find: Which statement about is correct.
Differentiate:
Now evaluate at the symmetric points:
and
Differentiate again:
Since , Rolle's theorem guarantees at least one point in and at least one point in where
Hence, for at least two values of in .
Therefore, the correct option is A.
Using symmetry and Rolle's theorem
The function
is symmetric about because replacing by gives the same value.
Compute the first derivative carefully:
so
Using ,
Apply Rolle's theorem to on the interval and again on . Since the endpoint values are equal in each symmetric setup, there must be zeros of in both subintervals. Thus there are at least two points in where .
Note: The provided the solution contains derivative-sign inconsistencies, but it explicitly concludes that option A is correct. The corrected differentiation above supports that conclusion.
Differentiating incorrectly. The chain rule gives , not . Always differentiate the inner term first.
Differentiating with the wrong sign. After obtaining , the second derivative becomes . Rechecking the chain rule avoids the sign error.
Concluding from symmetry alone that must hold. Symmetry helps identify relations, but the required existence result comes from applying Rolle's theorem to after showing it has equal values at two distinct points.
Get unlimited AI-adaptive practice, mastery tracking, and an AI tutor that explains every step — free to start.