NVAMediumJEE 2026Ionic Equilibria & pH

JEE Chemistry 2026 Question with Solution

Molar conductivity of a weak acid HQ of concentration 0.18M0.18 \, \text{M} was found to be 130\dfrac{1}{30} of the molar conductivity of another weak acid HZ with concentration 0.02M0.02 \, \text{M}. If αQ\alpha_Q happened to be equal with αZ\alpha_Z, then the difference of the pKa\text{p}K_a values of the two weak acids (pKa(HQ)pKa(HZ)\text{p}K_a(\text{HQ}) - \text{p}K_a(\text{HZ})) is _____ (Nearest integer).

(Given: degree of dissociation (α1\alpha \ll 1 for both weak acids, λ\lambda^\circ : limiting molar conductivity of ions)

Answer

Correct answer:1

Step-by-step solution

Standard Method

Given: Molar conductivity ratio ΛHQΛHZ=130\dfrac{\Lambda_{HQ}}{\Lambda_{HZ}} = \dfrac{1}{30}, concentrations are CHQ=0.18MC_{HQ} = 0.18 \, \text{M} and CHZ=0.02MC_{HZ} = 0.02 \, \text{M}, and αQ=αZ\alpha_Q = \alpha_Z with α1\alpha \ll 1.

Find: pKa(HQ)pKa(HZ)\text{p}K_a(\text{HQ}) - \text{p}K_a(\text{HZ}).

For weak electrolytes,

Λm=αΛm\Lambda_m = \alpha \Lambda_m^\circ

Given,

ΛHQΛHZ=130\frac{\Lambda_{HQ}}{\Lambda_{HZ}} = \frac{1}{30}

Since αQ=αZ\alpha_Q = \alpha_Z,

αΛHQαΛHZ=130\frac{\alpha \Lambda^\circ_{HQ}}{\alpha \Lambda^\circ_{HZ}} = \frac{1}{30}

So,

ΛHQΛHZ=130\frac{\Lambda^\circ_{HQ}}{\Lambda^\circ_{HZ}} = \frac{1}{30}

Using Ostwald’s dilution law for weak acids,

Ka=Cα21αCα2K_a = \frac{C\alpha^2}{1-\alpha} \approx C\alpha^2

Because both acids have the same degree of dissociation, the ratio of dissociation constants becomes

Ka,HQKa,HZ=CHQCHZ=0.180.02=9\frac{K_{a,HQ}}{K_{a,HZ}} = \frac{C_{HQ}}{C_{HZ}} = \frac{0.18}{0.02} = 9

Now,

pKa=logKa\text{p}K_a = -\log K_a

Therefore,

pKa(HQ)pKa(HZ)=log(Ka,HQKa,HZ)=log9\text{p}K_a(\text{HQ}) - \text{p}K_a(\text{HZ}) = -\log\left(\frac{K_{a,HQ}}{K_{a,HZ}}\right) = -\log 9

Its magnitude is approximately

log91\log 9 \approx 1

Hence, the nearest integer asked in the solution is 11.

Using proportionality of dissociation constant

Given: αQ=αZ\alpha_Q = \alpha_Z and α1\alpha \ll 1 for both weak acids.

Find: The difference in their pKa\text{p}K_a values.

From Ostwald’s dilution law,

KaCα2K_a \approx C\alpha^2

If the two weak acids have the same α\alpha, then

KaCK_a \propto C

Thus,

Ka,HQKa,HZ=0.180.02=9\frac{K_{a,HQ}}{K_{a,HZ}} = \frac{0.18}{0.02} = 9

Now convert to pKa\text{p}K_a scale:

ΔpKa=log91\Delta \text{p}K_a = \log 9 \approx 1

So the required nearest integer is 11.

Common mistakes

  • Using the conductivity ratio directly to compare KaK_a values is incorrect here, because the key condition given is that αQ=αZ\alpha_Q = \alpha_Z. Once the degrees of dissociation are equal, Ostwald’s law gives KaCK_a \propto C. Use concentration ratio, not conductivity ratio, to compare KaK_a.

  • Forgetting the weak acid approximation α1\alpha \ll 1 leads to using Ka=Cα21αK_a = \dfrac{C\alpha^2}{1-\alpha} without simplification. The question explicitly permits the approximation, so use KaCα2K_a \approx C\alpha^2 to get the ratio quickly.

  • Confusing KaK_a with pKa\text{p}K_a causes sign errors. Since pKa=logKa\text{p}K_a = -\log K_a, a larger KaK_a means a smaller pKa\text{p}K_a. Always convert carefully before taking the difference.

Practice more Ionic Equilibria & pH questions

Get unlimited AI-adaptive practice, mastery tracking, and an AI tutor that explains every step - free to start.

Related questions