Let . Let be a relation on defined by if and only if . Then among the statements The number of elements in is , and The relation is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive
- A
only is true
- B
both are true
- C
only is true
- D
both are false
Let . Let be a relation on defined by if and only if . Then among the statements The number of elements in is , and The relation is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive
only is true
both are true
only is true
both are false
Correct answer:C
Standard Method
Given: and iff .
Find: Which of and is true.
To count the elements of , list ordered pairs for which the maximum is or .
For , both entries must be at most and at least one entry must be . So the pairs are
which gives pairs.
For , both entries must be at most and at least one entry must be . So the pairs are
which gives pairs.
Hence,
So is false because it claims the number of elements is .
Now check the properties of .
Therefore, only is true, so the correct option is C.
Note: The solution contains inconsistent pair listings and an incorrect transitivity counterexample, but it explicitly concludes that only is true, and the source marks C as the correct option.
Property Check from the Extracted Solution
Given: on .
Find: The truth values of and .
The extracted solution's second approach counts:
and
Therefore,
So is false.
For symmetry, the extracted solution uses the fact that the maximum function is unchanged when and are interchanged. Hence is symmetric.
For reflexivity, the extracted solution notes that not every diagonal pair lies in ; for example, because . So is not reflexive.
The extracted solution states that is not transitive and therefore concludes that is true. Thus the final answer given on the solution's is only is true, i.e. option C.
Counting pairs with or incorrectly by including pairs such as or . These do not satisfy the condition because their maximum is . Restrict both coordinates appropriately before counting.
Assuming reflexivity from the presence of some diagonal pairs like and . Reflexivity requires every pair for . Check all elements of the set, not just a few examples.
Using an invalid counterexample for transitivity. To disprove transitivity, one must find and but . A chain where the third pair is actually in does not show failure of transitivity.
Get unlimited AI-adaptive practice, mastery tracking, and an AI tutor that explains every step — free to start.